A Viable Palestinian State

The New York Times

THURSDAY, MAY 25, 2006
It's long been clear that getting a workable, feasible Palestinian state out of two geographically separate masses of land in the desert will be an uphill battle. Now, because of two culprits and one enabler - Hamas, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel and President George W. Bush - that hill is becoming a mountain.
 
Bush handed Olmert the perfect welcome-to-Washington gift on Tuesday: conditional support for Israel's plans. Olmert wants to go ahead with former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's misbegotten plan to unilaterally redraw the borders of what could eventually be Palestine. The key word here is unilaterally, because the Israelis are prepared to do this without any input from the Palestinians, who would be left to try to cobble together a country out of whatever remained behind.
 
To a significant degree, the Palestinians put themselves in this spot by electing Hamas to run their government, and the Bush administration is right to refuse to legitimize a government dedicated to the destruction of Israel. But Bush should not punish the Palestinian people by endorsing any unilateral proposal - doing that would punish them for exercising their democratic right to vote.
 
Olmert's proposal has two parts, and the first one is fine: to withdraw Israeli settlers and troops from vast areas of the occupied West Bank. That's a worthy goal, and one that has been way too long in coming.
 
The problem is with the second part of the proposal: to retain several large settlement blocs in the Palestinian West Bank. That's a recipe for disaster.
 
Anyone who has ever really looked at a map of Israel, the West Bank and Gaza can see how hard it will be to form a Palestinian state. Even a future Palestine that includes all of the West Bank and Gaza is still going to be in two pieces with Israel in the middle, separating Gaza from the West Bank.
 
Speaking to Congress on Wednesday, Olmert said Israel was willing "to negotiate with a Palestinian Authority." He added, "In a few years they could be living in a Palestinian state, side by side in peace and security with Israel."
 
We'd like to see that, too. We only hope that Olmert and Bush realize that there will not be peace in the Middle East unless the Palestinians have a say in creating a state that can function.
 
 
It's long been clear that getting a workable, feasible Palestinian state out of two geographically separate masses of land in the desert will be an uphill battle. Now, because of two culprits and one enabler - Hamas, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel and President George W. Bush - that hill is becoming a mountain.
 
Bush handed Olmert the perfect welcome-to-Washington gift on Tuesday: conditional support for Israel's plans. Olmert wants to go ahead with former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's misbegotten plan to unilaterally redraw the borders of what could eventually be Palestine. The key word here is unilaterally, because the Israelis are prepared to do this without any input from the Palestinians, who would be left to try to cobble together a country out of whatever remained behind.
 
To a significant degree, the Palestinians put themselves in this spot by electing Hamas to run their government, and the Bush administration is right to refuse to legitimize a government dedicated to the destruction of Israel. But Bush should not punish the Palestinian people by endorsing any unilateral proposal - doing that would punish them for exercising their democratic right to vote.
 
Olmert's proposal has two parts, and the first one is fine: to withdraw Israeli settlers and troops from vast areas of the occupied West Bank. That's a worthy goal, and one that has been way too long in coming.
 
The problem is with the second part of the proposal: to retain several large settlement blocs in the Palestinian West Bank. That's a recipe for disaster.
 
Anyone who has ever really looked at a map of Israel, the West Bank and Gaza can see how hard it will be to form a Palestinian state. Even a future Palestine that includes all of the West Bank and Gaza is still going to be in two pieces with Israel in the middle, separating Gaza from the West Bank.
 
Speaking to Congress on Wednesday, Olmert said Israel was willing "to negotiate with a Palestinian Authority." He added, "In a few years they could be living in a Palestinian state, side by side in peace and security with Israel."
 
We'd like to see that, too. We only hope that Olmert and Bush realize that there will not be peace in the Middle East unless the Palestinians have a say in creating a state that can function.